On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:42:48AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:36:31AM -0800, Joshua Slive wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Anyone think it is a good idea if I did a > > > > > > s/@/_at_/g > > > > > > on the email addresses in the Changes file ? > > > > -0 > > > > - It won't solve the problem. > > > > - It looks amateurish > > Yup. -0 here as well. > > As simple as our script is, lots of spiders now do the converse: > s/_at_/@/g. =) The only thing would be to remove email addresses. > > I think that's a good thing to have though - if we don't regularly > accept contributions from that person, we should have a contact > email address for them. -- justin
"Me too!" -0 here. If we remove it from CHANGES, then they just crawl the dev mailing list archive. There isn't any reasonable way to avoid it, so let's not obfuscate our materials. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
