> From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 06 April 2002 13:53
> > http://httpd.apache.org still shows: > > > > "Apache 1.3.24 is the best version of Apache currently available; > > everyone running 1.2.X servers or earlier are strongly urged to > > upgrade to 1.3, as there will not be any further 1.2.X releases. > > At present, the Win32 port of Apache is not as stable as the UNIX > > version." > > > > We probably want to demote 1.3 a bit. > > > > What bothers me is the statement the "Win32 port of Apache is not as stable > as the UNIX version". This is not in the 2.0 part of the page. This only goes for 1.3. In the 2.0 section: "This version of Apache is known to work on many versions of Unix, BeOS, OS/2, Windows, and Netware. Because of many of the advancements in Apache 2.0, the initial release of Apache is expected to perform equally well on all supported platforms" > Are there any chances to get rid of that (IMO stupid) Win32 port warning > stuffs. No need, there is no warning ;) > If the Win32 port is not as stable as the UNIX one, how the stable is UNIX > Solaris compared to UNIX AIX, UNIX Linux, etc... See above. > And on the other hand what is the Win32 port? Is it Windows 95, Windows NT > 4, 2000, or XP? I think that we can safely assume that Apache 2.0 was targetted at Windows NT 4 and up. I personally wouldn't want to have to worry about Windows 9x (for obvious reasons I think). > MT. Sander
