Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I appreciate that you are trying to moderate my usage of the -1 (veto), > but feel it is my duty to inform the list as soon as possible that I > wouldn't be happy with this big of a change.
Maybe a veto wasn't appropriate, but it seemed clear to me that a number of people would rather have the new code side by side with the old for a while, and Brian didn't seem disturbed about that notion at all. Hopefully nobody will actually go remove worker as soon as Brian's code is committed :) -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
