On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Hmm..I don't see the VERSION symbol in the 2.0 version, and it looks > like the comments in the header stop at Version 1.3e. I could start > up at 2.0a, but would it be of much use to mention what has happened in > the mean time? Also, I think we depend on the RCS Tags now for printing > out the version string and whatnot. *PLEASE* just add one; RCS tags may still be de different even though results are comaprable (assuming settings are not changed). Feel free to start as 2.0.a or something. Dw
