On Mon, 6 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Mon, 6 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote: > > > See: > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7847 > > At most, we could do a browsermatch env-variable for this, but we > > can't just ignore the header. > > I don't see why not. The RFC says it's invalid IIRC, so why can't we > just ignore it? "Be lenient in what you accept."
Hmmm.... One quote is <rfc2068> If a cache uses a received 304 response to update a cache entry, the cache MUST update the entry to reflect any new field values given in the response. </rfc2068> So one possibility would be to simply invalidate the cache and make an unconditional request. This would, of course, kill performance. Joshua.
