On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:40:21PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > > Justin, is this related to your recent commits?
> >
> > I don't think so, but what does your link line say? It looks like
> > apr isn't being linked in correctly. -- justin
>
> Aww crap, I see what's happening. Because of the way it's finding -lapr
> now, it's finding the very old copy I have installed in /usr/local/lib and
> using it in preference to the one I just built. That's why only *some* of
> the APR symbols show up missing... it's just the ones that have been added
> since I built that old copy in /usr/local/lib.
Hmm. We could modify apr-config to always print the la-file even
if it doesn't exist yet. Can you try this?
Actually, I bet if you re-ran configure right now, apr-config would
print the .la file since it *now* exists (so it won't do the -L.. -lapr
construct).
I was considering that only printing the LA_FILE only when it exists
seems bogus. -- justin
Index: apr-config.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/apr-config.in,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 apr-config.in
--- apr-config.in 1 Apr 2002 19:30:27 -0000 1.15
+++ apr-config.in 14 May 2002 02:44:56 -0000
@@ -185,19 +185,10 @@
fi
;;
--link-libtool)
- if test -f "$LA_FILE"; then
- flags="$flags $LA_FILE"
- elif test "$location" = "installed"; then
- ### avoid using -L if libdir is a "standard" location like /usr/lib
- flags="$flags -L$libdir -lapr"
- else
- flags="$flags -L$thisdir -lapr"
- fi
+ flags="$flags $LA_FILE"
;;
--apr-la-file)
- if test -f "$LA_FILE"; then
- flags="$flags $LA_FILE"
- fi
+ flags="$flags $LA_FILE"
;;
--apr-so-ext)
echo "$APR_SO_EXT"
