Sorry to ask a so lame question, but what you call a flat file in this case is a file stored on the same machine than the one which is caching right ? In my case, as this is a reverse proxy, those files are delocalized and handlled by mod_proxy, so it won't work for any file at all ?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Holsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Arnauld Dravet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:45 PM Subject: Re: problem with mod_cache > Arnauld Dravet wrote: > > Yup i know it's a work-in-progress ... I'm just trying to use it :) Is there > > anyone who got mod_mem_cache actually working ? > > it's working for flat-files at the moment. the problem with the > mem-cache is that it expects the >whole< message to be in the first > brigade (in order to calculate the size of it) > now the proxy code currently splits it out into multiple brigades (which > is perfectly legal for it to do) which means mod_mem_cache can't > calculate the size of it.. so it passes.. > > it's on my todo list to fix this.. > but your welcome to patch it, > or try mod_disk_cache, as I don't think it has this limitation. > > > --ian > > Oh.. is anyone using the new PQ code.. i'd like to know if it is working > better than what was out there before > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:23 PM > > Subject: Re: problem with mod_cache > > > > > > > >>Thanks for the good detail... unfortunately, mod_cache isn't quite > >>there yet. It's still a work-in-progress. > >>-- > >> > > > > =========================================================================== > > > >> Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ > >> "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order > >> will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson > >> > > > > > > > >
