|
On using the pq code:
I currently have it crashing in cache_pq_pop after only few
refresh of a cache entry,
I am trying to fix it.
cache_pq_remove() -> cache_pq_pop()->page
fault
Jean-Jacques
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/02 09:45AM >>> Arnauld Dravet wrote: > Yup i know it's a work-in-progress ... I'm just trying to use it :) Is there > anyone who got mod_mem_cache actually working ? it's working for flat-files at the moment. the problem with the mem-cache is that it expects the >whole< message to be in the first brigade (in order to calculate the size of it) now the proxy code currently splits it out into multiple brigades (which is perfectly legal for it to do) which means mod_mem_cache can't calculate the size of it.. so it passes.. it's on my todo list to fix this.. but your welcome to patch it, or try mod_disk_cache, as I don't think it has this limitation. --ian Oh.. is anyone using the new PQ code.. i'd like to know if it is working better than what was out there before > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:23 PM > Subject: Re: problem with mod_cache > > > >>Thanks for the good detail... unfortunately, mod_cache isn't quite >>there yet. It's still a work-in-progress. >>-- >> > > =========================================================================== > >> Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ >> "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order >> will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson >> > > |
