Forwarded message: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 10:55:43AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I agree that HTTP-1.1 is broken, but it is debatable whether we should > > provide some sort of backwards compatibility. My thoughts are a > > StrictProtocol directive that defaults to true but provides for > > disabling the check and enabling the old behavior. In the process > > I'll also rework the 1.3 code to avoid the use of sscanf's '%n'. > > Votes/Comments? > > StrictProtocol sounds good. In http_core.c? Then we need a cross-module > call/variable to check the setting in http_protocol.c > > About the %n: Do you know of any platform that doesn't have it? It was > already in X3J11 (1988 ANSI-C) so I thought it's clean enuff. > > Martin > -- > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Fujitsu Siemens > Fon: +49-89-636-46021, FAX: +49-89-636-47655 | 81730 Munich, Germany >
-- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
