> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Auth checker - long term goal.. > > At 11:22 AM 7/10/2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > > > > > user foo" checks. 'require group' can stay in mod_auth or > > > > > go into a mod_auth_group. > > > > > > > > Didn't we decide to take this approach like a year ago? > > > > > > Hmm - been asleep as usual - if so - I'd love to make that split right > > > away ! I feel a patch coming... > > > >I am pretty sure that splitting auth from authz is even listed in the > >STATUS file. > > It is in fact in the ROADMAP file. See there. > > Then feel free to decorate with more details. I agree with Dirk, it's > too much to ask all porters/module authors to rework their entire > stratagem in the production branch. > > It's time for 2.1. We don't need to make .1 a total overhaul, simply > address the things we've wanted for some time, that are likely to > inflict new bugs on 3rd party modules.
I'm sorry, but that is completely bogus. If the API needs to change to make things better, then change the API. Stop trying to open a new dev branch when the current one is still moving forward quickly. We have this discussion every few weeks now, and every few weeks the 2.1 repo gets shot down, because these changes belong in 2.0. Ryan
