Bill Stoddard wrote: >Subroutine Name Source File Visit Enter % Ticks >=============== =========== ===== ===== ==== ===== >.ap_rgetline_core protocol.c 36 6 1.5 709 >
Darn, all that optimization work and it's still at the top of the list. >Shlib Subroutine Source File Visit Enter % Ticks >================ =========== ===== ===== ==== ===== >.apr_palloc apr_pools.c 78 78 2.9 1404 >.__is_wctype_std libc/__is_wctype_std.c 66 66 2.8 1320 >.apr_table_get apr_tables.c 21 17 2.6 1229 >.__divu64 divu64.s 3 3 2.0 976 >.__divi64 divi64.s 4 4 1.9 917 >.apr_table_setn apr_tables.c 24 12 1.6 781 > Was this with the latest version of the apr_table code? If so, I've run out of ways to speed up apr_table_get() and apr_table_setn() without changing the internal data structure used by the tables to something that supports faster-than-O(n) lookups. --Brian
