> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > At 11:42 AM 8/1/2002, you wrote: > >ianh 2002/08/01 09:42:33 > > > > Modified: build httpd_roll_release > > Log: > > we need apr-iconv now > > Even if we don't build it, this is extremely good practice that the folks > rolling and releasing the tarball TAG the apr-iconv tree in sync with > the current apr and apr-util trees..
I completely disagree. The problem is that the httpd_roll_release script is for rolling httpd releases, not APR releases. This change doesn't help people realize that they have to tag APR-iconv before they can release httpd. I really agree with Cliff, the change to pull apr-iconv out of APR is annoying, and it is going to cause problems. I understand that it is the "best" solution we have right now, it is still a bad solution. Ryan
