> + /* There's probably a better way to do this, but for the time > being... > + * > + * Right now the parsing is very 'slack'. Actual rules from RFC > 2069 are:
The relevant spec is RFC 2617. Were there significant changes since 2069? ....Roy
> + /* There's probably a better way to do this, but for the time > being... > + * > + * Right now the parsing is very 'slack'. Actual rules from RFC > 2069 are:
The relevant spec is RFC 2617. Were there significant changes since 2069? ....Roy