On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Ryan Morgan wrote: > > Thats a good point, I didn't think about that case. Maybe the safe way is > to just add a check for APR_TIMEUP?
I would much rather check for EAGAIN than continue to add more codes that could mean failure. Or put more succinctly, there are far more ways that this could fail than there are ways it could succeed. Call out the success cases, not the failure cases. Ryan
