"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 07:45 AM 10/28/2002, Greg Stein wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:01:15AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >>... > >> We need matching apr and apr-util trees which are just as stable. > > ++1 :-) > > >> That isn't necessarily what apr needs as it gears up for 1.0. > > > >Note that APR has already decided on a versioning scheme (insofar as any > >decision is firm for longer than a few months :-). > > Correct... APR is well on its way to releasing 1.0, in fact, IIRC the big > showstopper is finishing the versioning API and some stand-alone build > details.
hopefully the distinction won't prove to be important, but I didn't mean to question API stability in APR; instead I wonder about code stability :) -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
