Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 29 Nov 2002 02:17:31 -0500, > Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > It seems that Apache's ap_unescape_url() can't handle %uXXXX style > > > URI-escaped Unicode string, hence Apache::Request cannot neighther, > > > while CGI.pm can. > > my WinIE 5.5 / WinIE 6.0 uses this style of URI escaping when you use > javascript to submit page's content. ^^^^^^^^^^
AFAICT ECMA-262 does NOT use %uXXXX for encoding full URI's (see 15.1.3's description of the encodeURI function). However, Appendix B.2 does describe %uXXXX as an "extended feature" of the escape/unescape functions. > (Well, I'm talking about MovableType's bookmarklet, if you're > interested) Yes, I'm interested. I'm just not certain about who to blame for that :-). FWIW, I'm +1 on apreq supporting this, even if [EMAIL PROTECTED] decides against it. -- Joe Schaefer
