* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> We don't use mixed case for any definitions, and we require braces at
> all times, and for macros longer than one line, we wrap it with a do
> {} while (0) clause so that some compilers are a bit happier.
ah ok, thanks.
<snip>
> All of that said, I'm not really sure this code even merits being a
> macro. I'd rather see the conditional execution clear at the scope
> where LeaveNote is called rather than hidden in its definition.
> Yeah, it's slightly repetitive, but I'm not really buying what the
> macro is getting us here. IMHO, there should be an extremely high bar
> to creating a macro.
My thought was mainly to get some (perhaps subtle) semantics and better
readability. But I've no problem to put this directly into the code; it's
not so much, that one would loose the overview.
...tomorrow, if the time is ok ;-)
nd
--
s;.*;aaaaaoaaaoaaaaooooaaoaaaomaaaa:a:alataa:aaoat:a:a:a
maoaa:a:laoata:a:oia:a:o:a:m:a:o:alaoooat:aaool:aaoaa
matooololaaatoto:aaa:o:a:o:m;;s:\s:\::g;y;mailto:;
\40\51/\134\137|ndparker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;;print;
