* Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> + /* needs mod_authz_owner to be present */
>> + if (!strcmp(w, "file-group")) {
>> + filegroup = apr_table_get(r->notes, AUTHZ_GROUP_NOTE);
>> +
>> + if (!filegroup) {
>> + /* mod_authz_owner is not present or not
>> + * authoritative. We are just a helper module for testing
>> + * group membership, so we don't care and decline.
>> + */
>> + continue;
>
> Are we sure that mod_authz_owner has had a change to fill out this value
> under all (internal redirect) circumstances ? It may be that we need to
> mark a total absense of AUTHZ_GROUP_NOTE differently.
I'd say, there's no problem, because the group-db-modules are explicitely
hooked after mod_authz_owner and are called within the _same_ hook run. If
I understand it correctly, there can't happen anything weird between the
calls (or do I overlook something?).
nd
--
die (eval q-qq[Just Another Perl Hacker
]
;-)
# Andr� Malo, <http://www.perlig.de/> #
