On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:42:49 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > As for the Apache2+PHP stuff, we are not deflecting blame. We are simply > not acknowledging that it is somehow our duty to drop everything and > support Apache2 just because someone decided it was a good idea to release > a new web server. And when attacked repeatedly on this issue we tend to > point out that thread safety issues in commonly used libraries pretty much > nullify any threading gains of the new architecture since we'd have to > mutex them, and also the fact that the filter api's complexity isn't > making life easy for us, nor does the architecture mesh well with how PHP > likes to do things. As a handler under prefork it may work very well. Who > knows. Feel free to apply for a CVS account and write it, but please stop > trying to browbeat us into doing something. I personally have a working > web server that does what I need. Show me something irresistible about > this new server and I will be compelled to work on it myself. >
ok. you know have 2 implementations of the handler based php sapi for use with apache2, instead of using the Filter API. www.apache.org/~ianh www.apache.org/~jerenkrantz/apache2handler I don't know PHP's code review process or how to check the code in (I have a CVS account for PHP) my limited testing of the code appears that it works correctly. --Ian > -Rasmus