--On Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:24 PM +1100 Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're not the only one. I suggested a long time ago renaming the trees (when we did this whole mess), but was loudly shouted down. I think having httpd 2.1 living in httpd-2.0 defies any rational explanation.I'm confused about the branches naming. Is the following correct:
FWIW, your synopsis seems correct. Feel free to commit an explanation to httpd-site... -- justinHEAD is 2.1.0, so retrieving the httpd-2.0 rep, without specifying the tag will give me the 2.1.0-dev tree trunk:% cvs co -d httpd-2.1 httpd-2.0 So now if I commit things from the dir httpd-2.1 they will go to the dev trunk. To work with the stable tree, I checkout the APACHE_2_0_BRANCH: % cvs co -d httpd-2.0-stable -r APACHE_2_0_BRANCH httpd-2.0 now if I commit from the httpd-2.0-stable, things will go to the stable tree.