> -----Original Message----- > From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yes - all the way back. They provided patches for the older versions, > but RSA seems to be less and less enthusiastic about patching the > ancient 2001 and prior releases, e.g 1.2/1.3.
:) Yup. I had a similar experience. > I'd be happy to see us support the '2.0 generation' - if we focus on > 2.3, yet provide mechanics to deal with the fixups to 2.1/2.2 and > maybe even 2.0, then I'd be happy with that. How about just 2.3 ONLY ?. The problem is there are no data points available to see if anybody (other than you and me) is interested in getting mod_ssl to work with < 2.3. Further, I'd not be surprised if RSA tries to push ppl to use the newer releases - in which case, we can just enable for 2.3 and later. > Anyways, nice patch - I'd prefer if you would follow the "Fix One Thing" > rule of committing this patch; e.g. take it back apart and have each > commit labeled as to it's single purpose. But at least here, I'm +1 for this > to go into 2.1-dev and I'll help continue to review/improve it in-tree. Oh yes definitely - I'll break it into small patches and commit them seperately. I had no intention of committing it to the 2.0-dev. -Madhu
