Pier Fumagalli wrote:
"Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



The X-Forwarded-For would contain something like 192.168.1.2:19876 (instead of just the first bit before the ':'), and I would need to add another header containing the IP of the client connection (I was thinking about something like: "X-Forwarded-Address: 10.0.0.1:80"

What do you guys think?

I'm not sure if this is a good thing, especially if this header or the 'via' one has been around for a long time, and we might break things by changing what they expect.
it might just be easier to add X-forwarded-port




Reply via email to