At 07:01 PM 3/23/2003, Sander Striker wrote: >> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 1:55 AM > >> However, would it be a hassle to run APACHE_2_0_BRANCH for a few >> days as we prepare to release 2.0.45? > >I'd prefer we do it as we always do, run the release candidates on >daedalus. Keep HEAD on icarus.
I can live with that... give us some incentive to track down the 'interesting' behavior I observed this afternoon ;-) >> If you would you prefer a temp tag, I've tagged WROWE_2_0_45_RC1 > >I reckon this doesn't span APR? The accompagnying APR checkout should >be APR_0_9_2? WROWE_2_0_45_RC1 == APR_0_9_2 ... E.g. although we want to move twords choosing an explicit tag - all of our httpd-foo today expects the same tag for both APR and HTTPD. So yes - I applied that same WROWE_2_0_45_RC1 to the recently tagged APR candidate. Bill
