* Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, [ISO-8859-1] André Malo wrote: > >> I've tried several times... the patch continues to fail on test 35 and 54 >> here. Finally I went back to our initial patch and tried to figure out the >> insufficient test. The attached resulting patch passes all 54 tests on my >> machine. Other test(er)s and reviews of both patches are highly >> appreciated. > > This looks like a likely candidate also. I'll run it through my tests > tomorrow. I'm still puzzled why 35 and 54 passed for me but failed for > you... oh well, who knows. :) We'll give this one a shot.
Well, this is going to fall off the radar. What do we do now? Any other reviews/testers available? nd
