At 01:53 PM 10/20/2003, Cliff Woolley wrote: >On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> * isn't ap_die() broken with recognizing recursive errors >> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> +1: jeff, jim > >I looked at it and it seemed reasonable but it stretches far enough beyond >the bounds of my knowledge of its implications that I decided not to vote. >Consider this a +0.
I'm afraid I'm so far away from 1.3 that I'm in Cliff's boat, a strong +0 :) Have you had a chance to run it through the perl-framework testsuite? If so I'd give it +.5. Bill
