Indeed, I can see why it was designed this way however I think that it should be up to the admin to ensure that there is no cyclic symlinks. I don't think that some one should have to patch the code to use a CDSL in the Include Directive. Anyway here is a patch up to you guys if you want to implement it.
Note: Patch was done on 1.3.27 Shanon Loveridge System Architect Reporting Data Warehouse * Andr� Malo Yes, this is to prevent infinite loops caused by cyclic symlinks. In fact ... I think, we can safely remove this (at least since the fnmatch-includes). Opinions? * "Loveridge, Shanon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The code is using !ap_is_rdirectory to check that it is a dir but not a > > symlink (NOTE this is not true for the ErrorLog directive which allows a > > CDSL to be set)
CDSL_Include.patch
Description: CDSL_Include.patch
