Jeff Trawick wrote:
Brian Akins wrote:

Backported from 2.1. Stable for me in various loads.


without the non-portable atomic code available and enabled in APR, this is going to hurt performance, right? (more mutex operations performed in mainline path for the unlucky who use the non-portable atomics???) is it noticeable?


I was testing on x86 Linux which appears to do the apr_atomics in assembly.



--
Brian Akins
Senior Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies



Reply via email to