On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Brian Pane wrote: > > But doesn't unsetting the C-L header cause the C-L filter to > > automatically attempt to generate a new C-L value? > > Not unless the C-L filter sees the entire response in the first brigade > passed through it. It used to buffer the entire response in order to > compute the C-L, but I changed that last year.
Ah. Thanks for the reminder, Brian. I knew it was that way once upon a time. :-)
