Jeff Trawick wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:

If it does nothing unless a file is specified, why not enable by default?


to avoid silent growth in the set of code built into somebody's server... when does somebody have to add "--disable-foo" to create a build compatible with what they had with the 1.3.(n-1) release?

(I don't feel very strongly about it; it just seems like the right approach to me; over and out)

I guess if its disabled by default it doesn't hurt much to have it also not compiled by default.


Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff

Reply via email to