Joshua Slive wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Anyone have any problem if we enhance apachectl a bit to allow > > for -v/-V printout? Like ./apachectl version | ./apachectl fullversion ? > > I don't understand. "apachectl -v" and "apachectl -V" work fine. > (apachectl passess unknown parameters directly to httpd.) >
True, but I was thinking more in line with it being explicit, ala configtest. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
