On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:58:32 -0500, Albert Chin wrote:
> > If 2.0.50 addresses "one security vulnerability", why are two listed? > I thought CAN-2004-0488 was for 1.3.x? Someone probably miscounted.. And CAN-2004-0488 applied to mod_ssl for 1.3.x AND for mod_ssl in 2.0.x.
