On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Roy T.Fielding wrote: > Hmm, IIRC, "load"ing a cache means writing to it, not reading from it.
Doh. That does ring a bell in the back of my (usually lousy) memory. :) > Why not just change them to "cache_write" and "cache_read"? > Or "store" and "recall"? store and recall seem reasonable to me. > Kudos on the other changes -- those are some significant improvements. Yeah, it's really good to see the interest in this picking back up. This seems like a really good way to get us motivated to do a 2.2 release Sometime Soon. :) --Cliff
