On Sep 2, 2004, at 11:25 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Do we want to include the experimental MPMs in the 2.2 GA Branch?
Currently the MPMs in server/mpm/experimental are: - leader - perchild - threadpool
My personal feeling is to *not* include them in the 2.2 branch at this time. If any of the experimental MPMs are improved to a state we feel they can be tested, then lets put them back in the GA branch, in the experimental directory. If after more testing in the GA branch they prove stable, we can then take them out of experimental.
I'm not sure what you mean... I think that, at the source code level, all experimental modules (whether MPMs or not) should be included (but not *built* when doing packages). After all, the hope is that people try them out and provide fixes, patches, etc...
So I am +1 in keeping experimental modules in.
