On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] Andr� Malo wrote:
> * Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In general, people don't look for 1.3 patches in the 2.0 STATUS file > > and vice-versa :) > > As far as I can see, the current way to make changes is 2.1 -> 2.0 -> 1.3. > So it makes sense for me to look into 2.0 for possible 1.3 changes, but not > vice versa ;-) > > nd >
