Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
>> --On Friday, September 17, 2004 1:07 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Could someone please take a look at bug 31228 in bugzilla?
>>>
>>> It's just adding a new response code (226) which is defined in rfc3229.
>>>
>>> I'm working on a module that implements a type of rfc3229 delta
>>> encoding,
>>> and it'd be nice if people didn't have to apply a patch to Apache in
>>> order
>>> to use it.
>>
>>
>>
>> FWIW, I looked at it the other night and I'm mildly iffy on adding it.
> 
> 
> Any particular reason?  It seems like providing support for the response
> code specified in the RFC would only help encourage people to actually
> implement support for it in Apache, which seems like a good thing to me...

provided that garrett's patch is technically the correct way to add a new
status code to apache, and that RFC3229 went through the proper motions to
capture exclusive use of 226 within http, I don't see any reason why 226
shouldn't be added in 2.1.

--Geoff

Reply via email to