Garrett Rooney wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > >> --On Friday, September 17, 2004 1:07 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Could someone please take a look at bug 31228 in bugzilla? >>> >>> It's just adding a new response code (226) which is defined in rfc3229. >>> >>> I'm working on a module that implements a type of rfc3229 delta >>> encoding, >>> and it'd be nice if people didn't have to apply a patch to Apache in >>> order >>> to use it. >> >> >> >> FWIW, I looked at it the other night and I'm mildly iffy on adding it. > > > Any particular reason? It seems like providing support for the response > code specified in the RFC would only help encourage people to actually > implement support for it in Apache, which seems like a good thing to me...
provided that garrett's patch is technically the correct way to add a new status code to apache, and that RFC3229 went through the proper motions to capture exclusive use of 226 within http, I don't see any reason why 226 shouldn't be added in 2.1. --Geoff