Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:55 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..cut..]
Well the process is not quite so structured by design, but yes, I plan to propose we backport these into 2.0 (in time for 2.0.53) and I'll do the backport as I have time (maybe later this week).
Haha. Well, it requires three developers to approve a change for backporting. And, Bill has been excellent in driving these changes to be backported. I usually prefer to wait until I know that he or someone else confirms the commits work for them and don't do anything stupid before it even gets proposed. And, then another developer needs to sign off first...
You can help by testing Justin's patch and providing feedback to this list.
Absolutely! Thanks! -- justin
I just tested Justin's patch(es) by compiling apr-util_20040930041253.tar.gz / / apr_20040930041241.tar.gz and httpd-2.0_20040930041734.tar.gz and doing some tests for the problems that are described in 30278 / 21492. The result of my tests is that the problem is now fixed by Justin's patches. As the patch for 30278 has nearly not changed since 2.0.50 I think it is worth mentioning that
1. it is used at our company on a production system running 2.0.50 without any problems and fixing the problem it has been designed for
2. it has been tested by another user (Igor Fedulov) who opened report 30278
Hope that helps.
Regards
R�diger
