On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Yes - I understand that this means 1.x will never be used by > httpd. Version numbers are cheap. The APR project should > become used to this, if they are active, and httpd moves at > it's normal pace, it would be easy to go through APR 2.x, 3.x, > and land somewhere in version 4.x by the time httpd 2.4 or 3.0 > walks out the door.
Do you understand how ridiculous that sounds?
