On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Garrett Rooney wrote: > I guess I'm just arguing for a single branch that's the target of the > current development, as opposed to one 64 bit dev branch and one trunk > which holds other changes, thus requiring us to either invest constant > effort in merging changes from the trunk into the 64 bit branch or > letting it get kind of stale and then having a mega-huge merge into the > trunk at the end.
The only question is whether we want to keep trunk as 1.1-dev or 2.0-dev. But I guess with SVN it's easy to branch 1.1 and 1.0 off of what's now the 1.0 branch (rename the 1.0 branch to 1.1 and branch a new 1.0 branch off of that, or whatever). So sure, screw it. APR trunk is now 2.0-dev. Have fun.
