On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:08:26AM +0000, Nick Kew wrote: >... > Several folks on IRC favour an apr_dbi layer. That's great, but it's a > different project, and I'd certainly want to look at harnessing existing > DBI projects rather than reinventing that wheel.
Yes, but what you're seeing is a bunch of feedback that says, "Apache is the wrong level for the providers. Put those down at APR, and then build some Apache-specific support logic on that." IOW, the connection pool logic tied in with the server... great. And Apache can have that. But all that builds on basic infra that is located in APR(UTIL). Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
