+1, lets get something out there for the community to test. If we have to go through a bunch of 2.1.x-betas before we feel comfortable with branching, so be it.
Brad >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, December 13, 2004 4:30:29 PM >>> --On Monday, December 13, 2004 2:40 PM -0700 Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This would be 2.1.2-beta right? Not 2.2.0-beta1? Correct. Our first 'beta' release doesn't necessarily mean that it'd be 2.2.0-beta1. We can have as many 2.1.x betas as we want. However, I think it was said that the 2.2.0 branch will start with some 2.1.x beta - I just don't think we're quite at the branch point yet, but, IMHO, we should try to get some folks pounding on 2.1.x... -- justin
