* Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
> Yes. I don't know of anyone successfully using perchild. There is another > group working on a successor called something like mpmmux, but they've > been rather quite too. metuxmpm has been reported to be running successfully in production environments. <snip> > > Can perchild support the idea of becoming a user specified via an auth > > module using something like basic authentication? > > Not with its current design. For one thing, it needs to have a pool of > child threads available for each possible user, which would make it rather > inappropriate for a large number of users. For another thing, it > currently only supports different users on a per-vhost basis. But I > suppose that last restriction would be easy enough to relax. We've exactly the same problems in metuxmpm for now :( (see my last posting) But we're already working on demand-starting. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cellphone: +49 174 7066481 --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- Webshops -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
