On Jan 11, 2005, at 4:20 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Saturday, January 8, 2005 10:43 PM +0000 Ben Laurie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Errr... mod_backhand?
mod_backhand doesn't support Apache 2.x:
<http://www.backhand.org/mod_backhand/FAQ.shtml#question0>
Port it?
I think that we can come much further along with extending
the lb capability in proxy... For more sophisticated and
demanding environments, an external lb mechanism
is likely used. So my pers. pref would be to
see what can be done in proxy before seeing if
mod_backhand even needs to be ported. I don't think
that the web server should need to do everything :)
