On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:25:44 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: [snip]
> Is it "legal" for third party modules to rely on CORE_PRIVATE in order to gain > access to functions (and other bits) that would otherwise be out of bounds? > For > instance, I'm trying to rely on functions that help in creating sub-requests, > such as ap_create_request_config(), which is only available if I define > CORE_PRIVATE. I'm not sure if that The Right Thing To Do (TM)... I believe it is more of "you better know what you are doing" while using these functions and structures. It isn't like the Linux kernel's MODULE_LICENSE where if you are GPL you gain access to more of the kernel then if you are not. There are no legal ramifications of using the CORE_PRIVATE as I use it quite a bit in my mod_ftpd module on outoforder.cc
