William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:26 PM 3/19/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna Date: Sat Mar 19 21:26:22 2005 New Revision: 158303
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=158303
Log:
Test for APR and APR-Util one directory bellow httpd too. I like not having to put them inside srclib.
<grumf> I'm not keen on this change, since it complicates things
unnecessarily - some day we discover a tag and roll organized like this out of the blue?
What do you mean? I thought that the future goal was to unbundle apr* in httpd releases? So you're afraid of tagged and rolled (actually only rolled, since tags don't include apr* anyway) tarballs that don't contain srclib/apr* before we actually wish to unbundle? Isn't that the RM's responsibility?
My feeling is that it is the RM's responsibility. It does tell you which APR/APR-Util path it is using, so it doesn't leave you completely clueless.
Does config.nice not do what you want? Especially if you rename it config.me with all your absolute options that you don't tweak?
I don't see how that would help towards the unbundling goal. Also for development purposes it's way more convenient to allow apr* next to httpd as to require it be in srclib/.
Yep, i was tried of passing --with-apr and --with-apr-util to ./buildconf -- this has nothing to do with ./config.nice, and I thought making a ./buildconf.nice would of been a little excessive.
-Paul
