On 6-Apr-05, at 12:56 PM, Mads Toftum wrote:
mod_asis: yes -> no
I'd prefer -> most as it is rarely used but not totally useless.
Others mentioned mod_ssl which I think is too much trouble to be worth
enabling other than when requested explicitly - there's the whole crypto
regs issue and it does link in another lib, which is something that I
prefer limiting to when it is actually needed.
So what are the criteria for "yes", "no", "most" and "all"? I think it would be more productive to come up with common criteria than to argue about individual modules.
Perhaps "all" should just go away. It obviously does not really mean "all" and it is hard to come up with a good description of what it does mean.
As I said earlier, a lot of people seem to be surprised at what "all" does not include (ssl and proxy, for example). And as no tool is provided to list what "all" and "most" actually do, people are pretty well left to their own intuitions.
The current list (as produced by the shell script I pasted in an earlier message) is:
3. all cern_meta 3. all log_forensic 3. all mime_magic 3. all unique_id 3. all usertrack 3. all version
So what do those six modules have in common?
