[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

     * don't propagate input headers describing a body to a GET subrequest
       with no body
@@ -219,12 +220,34 @@
       -1: jerenkrantz (read_length isn't a sufficient check to see if a body
                        is present in the request; presence of T-E and C-L in
                        the headers is the correct flag.)
+      +/-0: wrowe (this has a negative impact on modules who wish to 'inspect'
+            the headers, e.g. an xml transformation affected by the query
+            string or request POST args.  The right solution is adopt apreq,
+            providing an API for filters to participate in POST bodies.)
       gregames: done in rev 160573

Will, can you help me understand your concern? this doesn't change the headers of the POST request. it only affects which new headers we generate for the new SSI GET subrequest.


thanks,
Greg



Reply via email to