Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/29/05, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

+1 from me :)

How appropriate would a 2.0/2.1 patch be as well?


Attached is an updated 1.3 patch which avoids specifying the directive
within limit.  Also attached is a 2.1 patch.

+1

Bill



Reply via email to