On 4/29/05, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me :)
How appropriate would a 2.0/2.1 patch be as well?
Attached is an updated 1.3 patch which avoids specifying the directive within limit. Also attached is a 2.1 patch.
+1
Bill
On 4/29/05, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me :)
How appropriate would a 2.0/2.1 patch be as well?
Attached is an updated 1.3 patch which avoids specifying the directive within limit. Also attached is a 2.1 patch.
+1
Bill