At 05:52 PM 5/11/2005, Paul Querna wrote: >I believe we should uphold the policy of using only released versions of >a dependency.
+1, however... >I don't see an APR-Util 1.2.0 coming very soon. The APR-DBD code could >still use more love. Why not? Looks like apr_dbd should simply be pushed off to apr_util release 1.3.0 and get the other fixes and features out the door, perhaps. >This is just an example of why I wanted to branch trunk to 2.1.x. I >have nothing against adding this specific feature -- it just happens to >require a non-released version of APR-Util. -1 for this specific purpose; I always saw httpd-2.2 as addressing only the handful of things we never did quite finish in 2.0. Those being the auth reorg, auth ldap, proxy and cache. If httpd-2.2 can really be boiled down to this small subset - I would very much like to see this work adopted. If it means creating a dbd-less apr_util 1.2.0 then so be it. Thoughts? Bill
