William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > At 02:10 PM 6/27/2005, Paul Querna wrote: > >>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> >>>Do we need an entire request? Wouldn't a 'null request' be faster? >>> >> >>Define 'null request'. > > > Would OPTIONS * HTTP/1.[0|1] be more efficient than an actual > request? >
It would work, but it doesn't make any difference. The request is not actually served. The child pops out of accept(), and notices that it needs to die.
