At 12:09 PM 7/7/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote:

>This was, iirc, to handle cases where a strtol could possibly set it
>to NULL; someone, can't recall who, seemed to remember one implementation
>which did that, so we just figured to-hell-with-it and add a safety
>check, just in case :)

In httpd-1.3, src/ap/ap_strtol.c, don't we provide our own
strtol which we can trust?

Bill


Reply via email to