At 12:09 PM 7/7/2005, Jim Jagielski wrote: >This was, iirc, to handle cases where a strtol could possibly set it >to NULL; someone, can't recall who, seemed to remember one implementation >which did that, so we just figured to-hell-with-it and add a safety >check, just in case :)
In httpd-1.3, src/ap/ap_strtol.c, don't we provide our own strtol which we can trust? Bill